agInnovation South Mini Land-Grant Meeting Notes
Texas A&M University – May 16-18, 2022
Agenda (PDF)
Agenda Briefs (PDF), Joint Session Agenda Briefs (PDF)

agInnovation South Business Meeting
May 17, 2022

Action Items:

1
  • Agenda – Approved with changed times for ARD meeting (8:00am) and the Executive Session (9:00 am) on Thursday
  • Minutes from September 28, 2021 Meeting-Approved
  • Interim Actions- Approved
  •  Meeting Rotation- Updated the online meeting rotation, announced next spring meeting will be at Mississippi State and all agreed to focus on Best Practice sessions vs. Business Meetings for future Fall meetings.  Also need more time for general discussions at future meetings.
2 Multistate Research Committee Report –Nathan McKinney

  • Status of Multistate Activities- Encourage faculty to officially join projects and not unofficially participate.
  •  Motion and acceptance of S1069 as the winning Nomination for Excellence in Multistate Research from the Southern region
  • SERA Administrative Advisor Assignments: SERA 41, 43 & 46
    • SERA 41 – Scott Senseman or Cliff Lamb (Gary to follow-up)
    • SERA 43 – Scott Senseman or Cliff Lamb (Gary to follow-up)
    • SERA 46 – Nathan Slaton
6 agInnovation South Budget Presentation (Executive Session outcomes) – JF Meullenet

  •  Gary to develop a history of the cotton assessment and recommend alternate uses of the funds to support strategic priorities.
7 Program Reports

  •  S9 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Utilization- Motion and approval of the Option 2 budget proposal.
8 General Discussion Topics

  • Data Sharing Proposal – Gary will request additional metrics from the directors and report back to S-AHS that there is enthusiasm for the project and additional metrics if proposed by the directors.
  • USDA/AMS Marketing Orders and Research and Promotion Programs (commodity groups wanting ownership of IP) – Gary to contact the National Ag Law Center to discuss the USDA/AMS IP issue and then draft a 2-3 sentence stance paragraph addressing this issue. “In addition to our university policies, the stance of the Southern Agricultural Experiment Station Directors (agInnovation South) is…”
  • Vegetable Consortium – agInnovation South office will send to the membership a draft memorandum of understanding and outline document based on the Small Fruit Consortium to continue discussions of next steps.
9
  • Resolutions – presented to Wes Burger, Resolution of Sorrow for Neville Clarke and, Resolution Celebrating the Regional Rural Development Center 50th anniversary.
  • agInnovation South Excellence in Leadership Award presented to Jean-Francois Meullenet – Gary will notify ESS regarding the national leadership award recognition.
  From ARD-agInnovation South joint meeting – Gary and Alton to work on a proposal for a joint winter meeting format and will share with both organizations.
  From S-APS-agInnovation South joint meeting- Gary and Wendy Fink will develop a proposal for possible funding to create and support a regional student database.

 

Agenda and Discussion

1 Welcome and Introductions – Rob Gilbert

  • Reviewed and approved the agenda
  • Reviewed and approved the minutes from September 28, 2021 Meeting
  • Approved Interim Actions
  • Meeting Rotation – Meetings scheduled through 2037. Next meeting at Mississippi State University followed by the University of Kentucky. Every other meeting is a joint meeting with ASRED. Southern Region will be in rotation for ESS Chair Elect in Fall 2023, and we will be seeking nominations in early 2023. This is an excellent opportunity for a director to get national exposure. The Southern region will be hosting the 2024 Fall Meeting (Chair Elect is the host). Nominations for the agInnovation South chair elect for agInnovation South will be made this summer before the fall agInnovation South business meeting.
2 Multistate Research Committee Report –Nathan McKinney

  • Status of Multistate Activities – Reminders that we expanded the MRC to 5 members this year and are now meeting 4 times a year. Now conducting mid-term reviews (first time!) for projects. Long list of projects terminating in 2023. Four new proposals are being evaluated for approval this year. Discussion about large participation in project activities, but low numbers are formally listed as participants in the project.
  • 2022 ESS Award Nomination for Excellence in Multistate Research – approval for S1069 moving forward as Southern Region nomination. The nomination deadline for submission of projects to the national committee was before our spring meeting, so S1069 was submitted before the vote at the spring meeting.
  • SERA Administrative Advisor Assignments: SERA 41, 43 & 46- These SERA projects need new Administrative Advisors.  Call for volunteers. Cliff Lamb and Scott Senseman expressed interest in SERA 41 & 43 and Nathan Slaton SERA 46.
3 Liaison Reports

  • NIFA Report – Kevin Kephart
    • USDA has published their strategic plan.  The next step is to develop science strategy teams.
    • Climate Summit- looking at contracting with Meridian as a facilitator with funding through a grant to a university (Colorado State University PI Gene Kelly). Initial summit kick-off with a webinar and subsequent meeting (hybrid) in Kansas City for discussions. The final virtual meeting will finalize the roadmap.
  • SRDC Report – John Green- See PowerPoint presentation-SRDC
  • ASRED Report – Gary Jackson (written report only as an addendum to these notes).
  • Cotton Report – Don Jones- See PowerPoint Presentation Cotton Report

Questions on “Written Only” ESCOP Committee Reports:

  • Budget & Legislative Committee Report – S Lommel
  • Communication & Marketing Committee Report – JF Meullenet
    • The CMC is now a standing committee.  More communicators will be invited to join the committee.
  • Science & Technology Committee Report – Susan Duncan
  • Diversity Catalyst Committee Report – Henry Fadamiro
    • Encourage everyone to submit award nominations from the Southern Region.
4 Strategic Roadmap Implementation Report – Implementation Working Groups – See PowerPoint Presentation- Strategic Roadmap Mid-Term.

General Discussion:

  • How can directors be kept in the loop with the Southern Research Communicators Consortium (SRCC)? Communicators could discuss consortium activities with their directors to ensure that the SRCC activities are important to the directors. The SRCC is composed of lead communicators and the science writers.
  •  How does the SRCC link with CMC? Twitter tag #AgIsAmerica or #SouthernAgResearch.
  • CARET needs communication in a digestible format.  Specific things that will be of use to CARET members.
    • If we want press to pick up anything, it needs to be written at the 9th grade level.
    • Information needs to be digestible for the general public.
  • Are we capturing what is important to the directors with the Strategic Roadmap goals?
    • Within the communication space, we need to add impact statements.  CARET representatives want an analysis of what we do and the impact it has.  Would Southern regional reports be useful?
    • Multistate projects have a separate website for impact statements (www.mrfimpacts) that is not well known. Stories about multistate activities tend to be through individual universities rather than the collective impacts. How can we inform CARET and legislators about these programs?
    • Can communications group provide template on how to engage the CARET representatives?  What type of communication would resonate with them?
    • Most common information requested by CARET representatives is the impact of our research or what sector of the economy is the research supporting.  Consider every 2-3 years work with agricultural economists to put together the impact of agriculture in the southern region and the value of the agricultural industry in the southern region that our research supports.”
    • How do agInnovation South priorities align with ESCOP priorities and committees?  If we have something we feel is important, we need to push that at the national level.
    • What is achievable for us as an organization?  Developing and capturing measurements of success. How do we know when we have succeeded?
      • Collaborative discovery- the goal is not just to hold a series of seminars, but to engage faculty across institutions. Develop a survey to assess the overall success?  Are we thoughtfully pursuing major granting opportunities that would engage faculty across the southern region? Can a baseline be established that would allow the working group to evaluate progress?
      • Enhancing Reputation- AAAS members (easy to count to see if new members are added) regional database will help that.  ESS Science and Technology committee suggests the need for a regional research award. 
      • Strategic Alliances- Ideas to increase interactions with 1890 institutions: assign liaisons, have a joint meeting, engage in multistate projects, write grants together, and faculty sabbaticals in both directions.
      • Communications- Impacts as a focus
5 Executive Directors Report – Gary Thompson (30 minutes)- See Agenda Brief.

  • Question about a working relationship with the other regions. There are regular standing meetings with the other EDs, APLU BAA, and NIFA leadership. The EDs work closely together to address national issues and to learn best practices for the regional associations. One measurable impact is that our communications initiative has been copied by the Western and NE regions.
6 agInnovation South Budget Presentation (Executive Session Outcomes) – JF Meullenet- See PowerPoint Presentation- Budget Presentation

  • Annual budget was approved with the base annual assessment increased to $425,000 including a one-time 3% merit raise for personnel.
  • Discussed the annual assessments for the Cotton Winter Nursery and CottonGen focusing on why cotton rather than other crops. The Cotton Winter Nursery was important to the region at the time and would be lost if not supported. CottonGen is an outgrowth of the Cotton Database was considered a valued resource to the region. The group questioned whether this something we want to support in the future. Gary to develop a history of the cotton assessment and recommend alternate uses of the funds to support strategic priorities.
7 Program Reports

  •  S9 Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Utilization – Bob Stougaard – See PowerPoint Presentation-S9. Discussion – Plant breeding programs are some of the most impactful programs that also generate resources back to us. The University of Georgia provided salary increases in FY2022 including $5,000 per employee raises and compression raises totaling $9,746. Taking into consideration all salary increases and the associated increase in estimated benefits, there will be a significant deficit in the labor budget. Three options for the labor budget include: Option 1: Rehire the vacant Admin Support position FT (8 FTE). Resulting deficit is $88,908; Option 2: Rehire the vacant Admin Support position PT (7.5 FTE). Resulting deficit is $61,329; Option 3: Abolish the vacant Admin Support position (7 FTE). Resulting deficit is $33,749.
    • S-009 Budget Request: A proposed budget of $572,899 is requested. This is an increase of $61,329 to cover the deficit as outlined in Option 2. Motion and approval of the Option 2 budget proposal.
  • AI Initiative Report – Susan Duncan.  Update on the AI Conference held at Auburn on March 9-11, 2022 and the formation of the new AI Multistate project S1090. Very effective in bringing people together and forming new partnerships.  What are some next steps?  NSF Center proposal or Regional Innovation Grant applications are possible.
8 General Discussion Topics

  • Data Sharing Proposal – Originating from the Academic Heads Section, this is a proposal to annually capture and share data across the region in a formalized process (see information in agenda brief for proposal details).  Discussion was positive regarding the idea, and the type of information that could be useful to directors on an annual basis was discussed. Average publications, citations and refereed publications, major awards, salaries etc. would be useful. Such data could be useful when developing large grant proposals. Gary will request additional metrics from the directors and report back to S-AHS that there is enthusiasm for the project and additional metrics if proposed by the directors.
  • USDA/AMS Marketing Orders and Research and Promotion Programs (Commodity groups asking for IP ownership) – General discussion: some commodity groups are adding in clauses in funding agreements to own IP developed from funded projects. Would like to develop a unified stance across the region that aligns with the Bayh Dole Act. The National Ag Law Center (located at the University of Arkansas) has expertise on commodity boards and how they work at the federal level. Would be very happy to engage with us. John Beuttenmuller from the University of Florida would also be a good contact. Institutions signing off on such IP agreements sets a precedent (for example, University of California signed off on some because there was nothing patentable). Gary to contact the National Ag Law Center to discuss the USDA/AMS IP issue and then draft a 2-3 sentence stance paragraph addressing this issue. “In addition to our university policies, the stance of the Southern Agricultural Experiment Station Directors (agInnovation South) is…”
  •  Vegetable Consortium – Strong support to form a Southern regional vegetable consortium among the department heads in SAC 6.  agInnovation South office will send to the membership a draft memorandum of understanding and outline document based on the Small Fruit Consortium to continue discussions of next steps.
  •  NAS Blue Ribbon Panel – no discussion
  • Academic Analytics and Rankings – AA has some helpful information. Has a feature to evaluate potential AAAS Fellows nominees. Can be used a recruiting tool to identify high performing faculty at other universities.
9 Resolutions – Lesley Oliver

  • Resolutions for Wes Burger, Resolution of Sorrow for Neville Clarke and, Resolution Celebrating the Regional Rural Development Center 50th Anniversary.

agInnovation South Excellence in Leadership Award Presentation – Rob Gilbert.

  • agInnovation South Excellence in Leadership Award presented to Jean-Francois Meullenet. Gary will notify ESS regarding the national leadership award recognition.
10 ESS Chair Engagement – Chris Pristos

  • As Chair, Chris is meeting with each region to share what ESCOP activities. See PowerPoint presentation ESS Chair Presentation.  No new money for Farm Bill initiatives and no new money for appropriations.

 

JOINT SESSIONS NOTES

ASRED-agInnovation South Joint Session
May 17, 2022

Joint Best Practices Session: Preparing and responding to severe weather disasters at RECs and local offices.  Panel: Jerry Fankhauser (UF), Gary Jackson (MSU), Jamie Mathews (UKY), Mike Yoder (NCSU).

Three Focus areas: Preparation, Short-term Responses, and Long-Term responses. See PowerPoint presentation- ASRED-agInnovation South Panel.

Jerry Fankhauser

  • Proper planning is a leadership effort.
  • You can prepare all you want, but things change quickly.
  • UF has overall university emergency plan and a “Continuity of Operations Plan.”
  • Major concern is how to adequately prepare for a response
    • Plans in place to move equipment to IFAS sites that are impacted.
    • Protection and continuity of equipment (i.e. -80 freezers stay running to protect research)
    • How to work in the field or at these affected sites is an issue?
  • Since 2018, whenever there is a storm off the Florida coast, they establish a Microsoft Teams site so Extension and research can communicate and establish mobile hotspots.

Mike Yoder

  • Communication with our people is key and starts pre-storm (with hurricanes).
  • 4-5 days before a hurricane makes landfall they will hold daily calls, which continue until no longer necessary.
  • 24 hours after disaster they expect all counties to report the status of the people and facilities.
  • Work with state emergency management teams, mostly on communications. County emergency managers often have their own plans that involve Cooperative Extension.
  • IS-100 (Introduction to the Incident Command System) and IS-700A (National Incident Management System (NIMS), An Introduction) FEMA training is requested.
  • EDEN – Extension Disaster Education Network.
    • Helps prepare for, respond or mitigate disasters
    • Short-term
    • Resource dashboard is very beneficial
    • Response notes- EDEN representatives in every state complete the daily response notes indicating what is the state doing in response to the disaster. NIFA uses the response notes to keep track of responses to disasters. Key to ensure someone is filling those out daily!

Jamie Matthews

  • Reminder that disasters are first and foremost about “people” and communication.
  • People are hurting and angry at the situation. Mental Health resources are important.
  • Most people know Extension and they want to communicate with people they know.
  • One issue is managing all the “help” people want to give.
  • Operations after the initial disaster can be a problem. How to spend the money can be an issue.  Insurance issues take time to navigate.
  • Want to rebuild back better but may be difficult to navigate with insurance settlements.

Gary Jackson

  • Southern region deals with a lot of natural disasters.
  • Pandemic is an emergency management operation as well.
  • Need disaster education professionals on your Extension faculty and staff.
    • Assist in making decisions
    • Help writing the continuity plan
    • Certified nationally in incident command
  • Need well-defined roles in the state and federal system emergency management operations.
  • Other state agencies understand that trained Extension staff play critical role. Mississippi State Extension roles include:
    • Education and certification (number one role)
    • Agriculture/forestry damage assessments
    • Animal recovery
    • Human shelters, nutrition, and health.

General Discussion

  • All had different experiences with state disaster management. Making that a meaningful engagement starts with developing university relationships with county commissioners
  • What are the emergency plans for the release of pathogenic materials or data that hasn’t been released yet?
    • Knowledge where BSL 2 or 3 labs are located is important and having appropriate PPE etc. ready to address needs. Loss of data is a problem. Ability to move generators to keep -80s running is essential.
    • Use 4H camps as a base of operations. Research and Extension work very closely to protect communities and people.
    • Director of facilities is key person. Get press releases out early.
    • We are at high-risk with all the basic research that is happening in coastal areas.
    • Communicate with research sponsors who will want to know if facilities are going to be functional next year?
  • Inventory of equipment and data. Is data in a printed only format?  Key word is redundancy for data.  Don’t neglect personal effects in the inventory.
  • Continuity plan of your organization defines how everyone should respond.
    • Where is the command center located?
    • Where are the server files backed up?
    • Who is in charge if the center director is unavailable or harmed in the storm?
  • Must have a communication expert as part of your professional team for disasters.
  • Insurance often requires you to build back exactly where and how it was before even if it doesn’t make sense.
  • Your “experts” often learn on the job. EDEN, FEMA, and EMI (Emergency Management Institute) offer training.  Disaster training should be up to every Extension professional.

 

Leadership Engagement – Kevin Kephart (NIFA), Doug Steele (APLU BAA), Bridget Krieger (LBA)

NIFA Update – Kevin Kephart, Deputy Director, Institute of Bioenergy, Climate, and Environment, USDA/NIFA  

  • Staff changes continue with the top three administrative positions are currently “acting” staff designations.
  • NIFA facilities in Kansas City: most people are still working remotely. Anticipate visitors will be allowed to visit the NIFA headquarters this summer.
  • Zoom review of proposals is going well and may continue for the foreseeable future.
  • Application deadline standardization is ongoing.
  • Planning a climate summit this fall to establish a dialogue within the community with the goal of developing a roadmap for NIFA on climate issues by the end of the federal fiscal year.

BAA Initiatives Updates and Comments – Doug Steele, Vice President for Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources, APLU

  • Mark Becker, former President of Georgia State University has been named next President at APLU.
  • Staff have returned to work at the new offices on an abbreviated schedule. Private offices will be available for people visiting DC and needing a place to temporarily work.
  • Three general sessions at the Joint COPs meeting will be open for everyone to attend.
  • FANR Focus comes out the first week of every month. Let Doug know if you are not receiving it in your email.

Budget Update and Discussion – Bridget Krieger, Senior Principal, Lewis-Burke Associates 

  • Lewis-Burke Associates is a government relations firm that has been in DC for about 30 years.
  • Represent only research universities, math, science, and health care entities. Very specialized in that realm.
  • Please feel free to reach out. They are in the initial learning process and will be for a while.
  • FY22 appropriations were completed in March and FY23 came up 3-weeks later. Lots of dual tracking right now. Some growth in our accounts, but not enough.  There is no new money.
  • Next year work will proceed in earnest on the farm bill. Will be asking everyone to weigh in, but Arkansas folks specifically to talk to Senator Boozman.
  • A LOT of new staffers on capitol hill that will require considerable education about the system. Most have limited to no knowledge of the Land-grant universities and functions of the experiment stations and Extension.

 

CARET-agInnovation South Joint Lunch Session
May 17, 2022

  • Introductions
  • CARET Strategic Plan reviewed (in Agenda Briefs)
  • Open discussion
    • What does CARET need from us collectively? How can we best help them carry our message to the people who make decisions on the hill?
    • Communication- they need information in a digestible format. Too often our impacts are not written to be understood by the general public.

 

ARD-agInnovation South Joint Session Notes
May 19, 2022

Research program relationships in South Carolina – Dr. Louis Whitesides and Dr. Paula Agudelo

Past Experiences…laid the foundation

Intentional relationships rely on:

  • True communications – equal partners…sharing cell phone numbers
    • “If they don’t have your cell phone number, they aren’t your true partner”
  • Intentional discussions about past relationships and funding histories
  • Joint visits to congress and state legislature
    • Joint, mutually agreed upon messaging, “one band, one sound”
    • Communication message is “Land-grant”
    • Complementarity of programs rather than competitive
  • Collaborations on grants is deliberate…administrative priority and requires faculty education
    • New & Beginning Farmers programs and SARE offer opportunities
    • Find common ground and submit projects together focusing on complementarity
    • NRCS Climate Smart Commodities proposal was a significant step forward in breaking the ice

Present Experiences

  • Communication is always a work in progress
  • Common state appropriations request to meet the needs of the “Land-grant System”
  • Joint meetings held between university administrators and legislative staff
    • Provides opportunities to discuss the “ask” with staffers well ahead of final decisions
  • Schedule joint legislative meetings with the Ag Commission in South Carolina (advocacy group)

Future Aspirations

  • Faculty and student exchanges
  • Joint appointments at Research and Extension Centers
  • Co-location of researchers
  • Leadership development programs
  • Exchange faculty profiles and interests/expertise along with matching complementary faculty

General Discussion: Proactive Steps to Build Strategic Partnerships 

  • This is the first formal meeting that our two associations… this is the time for change
  • How can we engage on larger-scale activities?  How can we facilitate work as a region?
    • Multistate and intrastate relationships
    • “communications lead to relationships which lead to trust which lead to resources”
  • Support for reciprocal liaisons
    • Moses Kairo (University of Maryland Eastern Shore) proposed as the first ARD liaison to agInnovation South then rotate
    • agInnovation South will propose director to be a liaison to ARD
  • Support for a Joint ARD-agInnovation South Winter Meeting
    • Focus on our research interactions as a region
    • Co-convene with CARET-AHS was proposed but concern expressed about keeping the focus on the joint meeting
    • Alternating in-person and virtual meetings was proposed with in-person scheduled for opposite years from the ARD research symposium meeting.
    • Gary and Alton to work on an agenda together to share with the group
  • Relationship design strategy
    • Consider what is to be accomplished and what collaborative resources are available
    • Strategically collaborate to facilitate connections
    • Consider existing successful models to develop and fund collaborations
      • Florida State model for state-funded collaborative projects through the Alabama Agricultural Legislative Alliance
    • Need to ensure the relationships don’t fizzle out after a few years
      • Record the genealogy of collaborative relationships and efforts
      • Continual education of new Directors and faculty about the importance of partnerships (include during faculty on-boarding)

S-APS – agInnovation South Joint Session
May 19, 2022

Joint Best Practices Session: Building the Pipeline from Undergraduate to Graduate Studies.  See PowerPoint presentation of two student pipeline case studies- APS□agInnovation South. (Note: Pathways may be a more appropriate term than pipeline)

  • Need to address the barriers. Tennessee State University (TSU) and Vanderbilt created the “Earth Horizons” program that is team taught between Geography and Forestry.
    • Aim to strengthen the pathway for minority students entering geoscience graduate programs to address social, economic and environmental issues are informed by the geosciences including natural disasters, public health, resource management and climate change.
    • Brought in speakers who could relate directly to the students “looked like them.”
    • Students of color from urban areas often know nothing about Ag, so need to introduce concepts at an earlier age.
  • Need to introduce the principles of Graduate School early in an undergraduate student’s career (freshman/sophomore).

Internships and other programs

  • HBCU Summit at Virginia Tech – Graduate school comes to the colleges.
    • Faculty are asked to bring 2 students, which has resulted in student recruitment and enhanced collaborations between faculty.
  • “Deans Scholars programs” and “Research Scholar programs” so students get 4 years of research experience with an expectation that they present at a conference.
  • Success partnering with Extension for internships.
  • Undergraduate research internship program at the University of Florida is available in the summer and spring/fall semesters.
  • To disseminate information about these internships and other programs, send to the Academic Programs as they are connected to academic advisors and faculty.
    • Coordinate with Gary who can coordinate with Wendy Fink.
  • Faculty academic advisors at the University of Florida are following a more “career coach” model.
    • They also have professional advisors helping students with the day-to-day.
    • Faculty can be a key person to connect students with professional opportunities.
  • Research and Extension Experiential Learning for Undergraduates (REEUs)
    • How do we institutionalize the concept?
    • Oklahoma State University – REEU-type projects are being expanded as a regular part of the university through internally funded REEU projects.
    • University of Florida – Has incorporated professional development aspects into a cohort-based internally funded REU.
      • College of Engineering is the major player providing $5K for students.
      • Had a difficult time recruiting Ag students into the program so they stopped participating.
      • College of Engineering started an undergraduate database where students interested in graduate school at any engineering school in the country that participates in this program can submit information (self-reported by students).
        • Rich recruiting database that could be developed in other disciplines to attract graduate students or to be part of an REEU.
        • University of Florida has a database of potential graduate students they can mine, but it isn’t quite as powerful as when connecting like universities.

Action Item: S-APS and agInnovation South to look at possible funding to create and support this a regional student database.  Wendy and Gary to work on this. 

  • Industry internships appear to be a priority with legislatures (training the workforce).

 

ASRED Report to the agInnovation South
May 2022

(Not included in the meeting agenda briefs)

AHS Data Collection Question

  • The Southern Region Administrative Heads have proposed initiation of a regional database related to personnel, programs and budgets. ASRED members agreed that this could be useful, and it must be well-defined. ASRED suggested that data collection be every 2 or 3 years rather than annually. Directors also would like to have a representative on the planning committee. Currently, it is difficult to find appropriate comparative data when comparing institutions or when an administrative head needs to advocate for resources to enhance a particular area.

National Academies Report Responses (Regional response was provided by April 29)– ECOP Chair, Wendy Powers asked for regional responses. Directors are asked to go to  https://nap.nationalacademies.org/land-grant-collaboration/form/ to review the report and respond on the form as well as provide comments to Ron Brown for a regional response to ECOP by April 29. Following questions may facilitate thoughts and responses.

      1. What is your initial reaction?
      2. What is missing in this report, with explanation why it should be included.
      3. What is good in this report and/or anything that should be stressed more?
      4. What increases Extension collaboration, with:
      5. Within and among LGUs (internal integration of Extension with other mission areas)
      6. With partners

Section 1: Collaboration in the Land-Grant System

  • In the 1890 and Southern regions, the Program Leadership Network (PLN) in Extension includes all 1890s and 1862s and is organized around 8 standing committees. Leadership for this overall effort and most of the 8 committees alternates annually between 1862 and 1890 institutions. The PLN (http://srpln.msstate.edu/) provides for multistate and multi-institutional cooperation in Extension programming, with each of the 8 committees having annual multi-institutional plans of work.
  • In addition to multistate research, there are Extension and Research groups (known in the Southern Region as SERAs or Southern Extension and Research Activities) in multiple subject or issue areas that involve faculty from multiple institutions from both a research and Extension perspective, including 1862s and 1890s (https://saaesd.org/southern-extension-research-activities-sera/). These types of multi-function, multi-state and multi-institution groups exist in all regions of the U.S.
  • In addition to SERAs, there are also groups like the Southern Region Extension committee, North Central Farm Management Extension Committee and Western Extension Committees that collaborate on regional projects, national conferences, in-service training, including Farm Bill training and more. The regional Risk Management Education Centers sometimes provide support for the committee projects and often support multi-state projects proposed through grant processes. Through academic professional associations multi-state relationships and collaborations are fostered not only among LGUs but with other institutions as well.
  • An example of national-level multistate and multi-institutional collaboration is the ECOP-supported Program Action Teams. Currently there are teams in the following areas: Climate, Workforce Development, Urban Agriculture, 4-H Youth Development, DEI, Health Equity and Well-Being, and Broadband Infrastructure Access and Literacy. Team members include faculty from 1862, 1890 and 1994 institutions throughout the US, as well as non-university partner groups.

Section 2: The Rationale for Collaboration

  • A key component is also collaboration among scientists from different colleges (engineering, sciences, medicine, veterinary medicine, etc.) within the same institution. This brings expertise to a college of agriculture that may not normally be within the existing faculty.
  • Both the various SERAs and the multiple PLN committees, mentioned above, allow for reducing duplication and redundancy of effort, reducing costs and benefitting from the diverse mixture of faculty talent. Often strengths at one institution can cover for weaknesses at another.

Section 3:  Barriers to Collaboration and Ideas for Overcoming Them

  • The report in this section identifies some real barriers to collaboration, including inequities, institutional culture and policies, and time commitments of faculty. Examples of successful and sustained cooperation/collaboration, however, raise the question of how and whether type of funding impacts sustainable collaboration. The authors of this report might be justified in exploring whether there is significant advantage to cooperation/collaboration in capacity funding over competitive funding. Sustained and beneficial cooperation in the Southern region, for example in the PLN, depends on capacity funds. Dependable funding promotes a sustainable infrastructure where collaboration is planned and on-going, as opposed to a start and stop exercise.
  • Based on changing budget situations, the following statement from the report is true also in many 1862 institutions: In 1890 and 1994 institutions, fewer faculty members are generally available to share teaching, research, and extension responsibilities.
  • In understaffed units, having temporary funds from indirect costs for additional support is of limited value in sustainable collaboration.

Section 4: Amplifying and Communicating the Impacts and Outcomes of Collaboration

  • The National Impacts Database (https://landgrantimpacts.org/) includes impact statements from both research and Extension Land-Grant programs and is supported by ECOP and ESCOP. This database is being improved on a continuing basis and is expected to become closely aligned with the APLU BAA Communications and Marketing Committee.
  • There are also examples of multi-institutional and multi-functional planning and reporting (to NIFA) of 1862 and 1890 institutions.
  • The national EFNEP leadership team is another example of multi-institutional cooperation that has some success in using common indicators to report on collaborative impacts.
  • Good communications and commitment to work together at the highest levels as well as at the working level influence the nature of collaboration. Accountability in the process from the beginning when there are collaborative efforts, shared recognition and sufficient funding and time to accomplish the goals promote effective collaboration.
  • In communicating impacts, there is a need for institutions to demonstrate their individual relevance and significance in order to maintain state funding. State legislators and constituency groups value what gets done in and for their state.

County-based staffing of 1890 LGUs

  • ASRED Chair Rich Bonanno commented on a recent poll related to this topic. It will be placed on upcoming agendas for follow up discussion.

Follow-up of 1862/1890 Dialogue & the CTRU Program (from Rachel Welborn of the SRDC)

  • ASRED Directors agreed that CTRU training for middle managers from different institutions would be helpful. This same action idea surfaced as a need in last week’s Coming Together state team call.  The states believe this would help mid-managers understand the dialogue more completely so they can better support county level conversations and involvement of county agents/educators. Ron Brown will contact the SRDC.

Key Ideas Discussed at the Action Forum

SNAP-ED FUNDING

  • Advocate for all LGUs to receive SNAP-Ed funding to support nutrition education efforts to reach SNAP eligible audiences
  • Work together to increase funding for SNAP-Ed for all 1862 and 1890 LGUs in our region

TRAINING/LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

  • CTRU training for middle managers from different institutions
  • Create a regional leadership opportunity for Southern/1890 Region, similar to North Central National Extension Leadership Development to meet the specific needs of the region.

RECRUITMENT/RETENTION/ADVANCEMENT OF DIVERSE STAFF AT ALL LEVELS

  • Assessment of our efforts relative to diversity
  • Proactively recruit diverse people to Extension positions

STRATEGIC PLANNING – VISIONING (not selected for exploring during the Action Forum)

  • Develop a vision, focus area, and plan as a Southern Region (goals, priorities, key steps, timelines)
  • AEA/ASRED task the PLN committees in the Southern Region to develop action plans related to equity and inclusion for Administrators and Directors
    • 1890 and Southern Region Land Grant NUEL leadership accepted state proposals to host the 2024 National Urban Extension Conference.

Other Items

  • ASRED Directors discussed Language Access Plans. Review of institutional programs is underway with regards to language services.
  • Civil Rights Reviews will be placed on the upcoming agendas. Ron Brown will poll to determine when each institution last had and next expect a CR review.
  • ASRED members discussed the issue of definitions of Cooperative Extension, Extension, Engagement and Outreach and how these words and definitions impact structure, roles, assignments, funding and opportunities at the university level, particularly as related to the broader university outreach functions. A consensus definition of these terms may be helpful in our work with partners and administrators. Laura Stephenson, Tom Dobbins, Damona Doye, Ron Brown and Laura Johnson are assigned committee to draft definitions of the terms.
  • DEI Needs – a review of current in-service training programs will be conducted. Experiment Station and Extension Directors collaborated on identifying DEI Points of Contact at each institution.
  • As ECOP’s representative on the National ECOP 4-H Leadership Committee, Laura Stephenson announced and congratulated Ed Jones as the new Committee Executive Director. Ed will continue as Director at Virginia Tech until a successor is named.

Upcoming Dates

  • June 10 – ASRED Monthly Meeting
  • July 10 – ASRED Monthly Meeting
  • July 19-21 – Joint COPs meeting is being planned as an in-person meeting at the Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington DC
  • Aug 22-25 Joint PLN/AEA/ASRED in Texas, Oct 14
  • September 25-28 – National Extension Director and Administrator (NEDA) meeting is planned, jointly with Experiment Station Directors, for Baltimore, MD at the Marriott Waterfront Hotel.